by Pierre Gurdjian,
Thomas Halbeisen, and Kevin Lane from McKinsey Quarterly - Jan 2014
This article puts
forward a straightforward - and to some extent simplistic - approach to the
challenges of designing and delivering leadership training. It does
however cite interesting real-life examples of what went well and where
mistakes were made.
The authors summarise
the four most common mistakes as:
- Overlooking context.
- De-coupling reflection from real work.
- Underestimating mind-sets.
- Failing to measure results.
- De-coupling reflection from real work.
- Underestimating mind-sets.
- Failing to measure results.
But it is the
“de-coupling” that has sparked the most discussion within MTP. Whilst it
is agreed that working on real-life projects is key to successful transfer of
learning, benefits can only be maximised when there is top management
commitment during project selection and later during implementation and
follow-up. We have a number of clients who have managed this
exceptionally well, despite both the real and perceived difficulties of doing
so; the time, effort and associated expense should not be underestimated.
Another area of interest
to us was the section on “mind sets” and the need for lasting behaviour change.
Where the article describes the senior managers in a professional
services business as being uncomfortable once discussions moved away from their
functional expertise, the article does not say what were the “concrete steps”
that led to the necessary change. We would argue that specific business
training (particularly financial acumen) works well in these types of
situations, alongside more traditional leadership and behavioural skills
programmes. Certainly, the example given of sales managers committing to
unprofitable contracts despite attending a generic finance course rings true.
Whilst the article describes the “control tower” that eventually led to
lasting improvement, it seems to us that a better defined and tailored finance
course, providing appropriate analytical tools, would have worked better.
To summarise then, an
interesting article for anyone new to management learning with some
thought-provoking examples that may apply in your particular business.
The article is unlikely to bring any new insights to an experienced
practitioner however, and the lack of specific company names adds to the
somewhat theoretical feel and simplistic conclusions.
1 comment:
Leadership training programs and succession planning can help identify people with the potential to fill leadership positions and mould, shape and groom the executive team of the future.
Leadership in the UK
Post a Comment